Comparación de performances en clientes Lotus Notes 8.0.1, 8.0.2 y 8.5 (Beta 1 y Beta 2)
Gonzalo Parada  Enero 13 2009
Gonzalo Parada  Enero 13 2009
Comparación de performance en clientes

Lotus Notes 8.0.1, 8.0.2 y 8.5 (Beta 1 y Beta 2)

 

Arranque caliente
Arranque frío
Memory
Response Times
8.0.2 vs. 8.0.1
73%
52%
21%
15%
8.5 Beta 1 vs. 8.0.1
41%
36%
5%
6%
8.5 Beta 2 vs. 8.0.1
76%
47%
17%
18%

Definiciones

Arranque
Los resultados del arranque son una combinación del tiempo de respuesta desde el doble clic para ejecutar Lotus Notes sumado al momento de hacer clic en Aceptar en la solicitud de la contraseña hasta el arranque final de Lotus Notes.

El consumo de memoria
Se refleja en los resultados del trabajo en conjunto de los procesos nlnotes.exe y el proceso de java notes2w.exe

Tiempo de respuesta
El tiempo acumulado de respuesta se refiere a las numerosas acciones del usuario (leer correo, responder, enviar, abrir el calendario, etc) con cada una de las acciones ponderado por la frecuencia con una particular acción a realizar.

Configuración de equipo
Thinkpad T30
CPU Type: Mobile Intel® Pentium® 4 Processor
CPU Speed: 2.00GHz
Installed Memory: 1 GB
Hard Drive: 40 GB HTS541080G9AT00 5400RPM Parallel-ATA
Connection Speed: 100 Mbps

 

Notes 8.0.2
Start-up

Warm Start-up improved by 73% in Notes 8.0.2 when compared against Notes 8.0.1 (Notes 8.0.2 re-launching in a quarter of the time vs 8.0.1)
Cold Start-up improved by 52% in Notes 8.0.2 when compared against Notes 8.0.1 (Notes 8.0.2 the first time after boot launches in half the time compared to 8.0.1)
Memory Consumption

The memory footprint improved by 21% when compared against Notes 8.0.1
Response Times

The cumulative response time improved by 15% when compared against Notes 8.0.1


Notes 8.5 Beta 1

Start-up

Warm Start-up improved by 41% in Notes 8.0.2 when compared against Notes 8.0.1 (Beta 1 re-launches in a third of the time vs. 8.0.1)
Cold Start-up improved by 36% in Notes 8.0.2 when compared against Notes 8.0.1 (Beta 1 the first time after boot launches in a third of the time vs. 8.0.1)
Memory Consumption

The memory footprint improved by 5% when compared against Notes 8.0.1
Response Times

The cumulative response time improved by 6% when compared against Notes 8.0.1

Notes 8.5 Beta 2

Start-up

Warm Start-up improved by 76% in Notes 8.0.2 when compared against Notes 8.0.1 (Beta 2 re-launching in a quarter of the time vs 8.0.1)
Cold Start-up improved by 47% in Notes 8.0.2 when compared against Notes 8.0.1 (Beta 2 the first time after boot launches in half the time compared to 8.0.1)
Memory Consumption

The memory footprint improved by 17% when compared against Notes 8.0.1
Response Times

The cumulative response time improved by 18% when compared against Notes 8.0.1

De todo modos ya estamos utilizando el release de 8.5 supongo!! (al menos yo si) el cual mejora considerablemente la performance.


Lotus Notes 8

Comparación de performances en clientes Lotus Notes 8.0.1, 8.0.2 y 8.5 (Beta 1 y Beta 2)